Conclusions
Although there was an error in our
calculations during the
modeling process, the corrected model discharge rate of 55.8
cm³/sec lies
between the incorrect value of 2.71 cm³/sec and the maximum
discharge value of
309 cm³/sec that was determined from the model.
Thus we can believe that the model should be able to
handle the
corrected discharge rate.
Our model helped to us to gain an understanding of
the
system and proved that the retaining structure could handle large
discharge
rates with minimal to no flooding occurring. In
addition the model proved that algae can be contained
by the
barrier.
Due to these conclusions, we believe that if a retaining
structure is put in place an algae farm could be created in Lake
Mendota and
begin to reduce nutrient and algae levels in the lake.
However, this is just a start of the analysis that needs to
take place if this idea is to become a reality. Extensive
time and resources will be needed to ensure that
such a system
is properly engineered. A brief summary
of the future analysis is available in the Future Analysis section.
|
