Wave
height increase
from storm surge and surge
protection
from
barrier islands
and coastal wetlands
CEE
514
Coastal Engineering Final Project
By
Nick Bennett
University
of
Wisconsin-Madison
Motivation
Hurricanes and tropical storms are very dangerous
naturally occurring weather events. Each year the United States
coast is affected by these storms and the associated destruction that
they create. This includes damage due to high wind speeds and the
subsequent storm surge and increased wave height that come along with
it. Flooding from this surge and the energy inherent in the storm
cause even more damage. While the damage caused by storms can be
substantial in coastal areas, it would undoubtedly be greater if not
for naturally occurring obstacles such as barrier islands and coastal
wetlands. I will analyze whether or not wave height is increased
when there is storm surge, and the effect that barrier islands and
wetlands have on dampening the storm's intensity.
Growing up in the Southeastern United States I have
a natural interest in tropical storms and hurricanes and why they
create so much damage. My goal is to understand how storms create
so much damage from the surge they produce and how it could be worse
without natural obstacles.
Saffir-Simpson
Hurricane Scale |
||||
Category |
Wind
speed |
Storm
surge |
||
5 |
≥156 |
>18
(>5.5) |
||
4 |
131155 |
1318 |
||
3 |
111130 |
912 |
||
2 |
96110 |
68 |
||
1 |
7495 |
45 |
||
Additional
classifications |
||||
Tropical |
3973 |
03 |
||
Tropical |
038 |
0 |
Fetch |
Wind speed
(m/s) |
depth (m) |
Wave
height (m) |
200 km |
69.3 |
1 |
1.12 |
|
|
2 |
1.76 |
|
|
3 |
2.3 |
|
|
4 |
2.77 |
|
|
5 |
3.21 |
|
|
6 |
3.61 |
|
|
7 |
3.99 |
|
|
8 |
4.36 |
|
|
9 |
4.7 |
|
|
10 |
5.03 |
|
|
15 |
6.51 |
|
|
20 |
7.74 |
|
|
25 |
8.75 |
|
|
30 |
9.59 |
|
|
40 |
10.87 |
|
|
50 |
11.78 |
Increase in wave
height with increase in water depth due to storm surge
F*=gF/Ua2
t*=gt/Ua
F*eff=(t*/68.8) 3/2
H*s=gHs/U102=.0016(F*eff)0.5
for duration limited
H*s=gHs/U102=.0016(F*)0.5 for fetch limited
In open water, before the surge gets to the barrier island, calculate
the wave height:
F*=9.81m/s^2*200000m/(69.3m/s)^2=408.5
t*=9.81*(21600 sec)/(69.3m/s)=3057.7
F*eff=(3057.7/68.8)^1.5=296.3
F*>F*eff so the wave height is duration limited.
H*s=gHs/U102=.0016(296.3)^.5
Hs=13.5 m
In the bay area between the barrier island and the mainland, the fetch
is now 2 km
F*=9.81m/s^2*200m/(69.3m/s)^2=4.085
t*=9.81*(21600 sec)/(69.3m/s)=3057.7
F*eff=(3057.7/68.8)^1.5=296.3
F*<F*eff so the wave height is fetch limited.
H*s=gHs/U102=.0016(4.085)^.5
Hs=1.58 m
To account for diffraction I needed to come up
with a diffraction coefficient. I know it will be small and
diffraction will only occur on the ends of the very long islands.
I assume that the waves approach the end of the islands at a Θ=90o angle. I will also assume that
the angle Β=45o. It is still a 2km
distance
from the barrier island to the mainland, so from trigonometry I can
find r. L
is still 224.6m from my calculation before. Then:
r= 2km/sin(45o)=2828.4m
r/L=2828.4m/224.6m=12.59
From the table for finding the diffraction coefficient based on values
of Θ,Β,
and r/L, then kD is:
kD =0.07~0.08
A diffraction coefficient this small means that
when the incident waves reach the shore the wave height will be much
less than it was. The significant wave height will then be much
smaller than the 13.5m that I had calculated for wave height in the
open ocean. Reflection would still play a part in making the
diffracted waves higher after they bounce off of the mainland.
These results show that a barrier island would in
effect lower the wave
height because of the lower fetch involved before the waves hit the
mainland while in the bay. As stated before it is a simplified
calculation that does not take into account the forces of diffraction
or reflection. However, my diffraction coefficient from above
shows that it is a valid statement.
E=Ek+Ep=ρgH2L/8
Assuming it is deepwater offshore,
L0=1.56T2
L0=1.56(12sec)2=224.6m
E=(1000kg/m3)*9.81m/s2*(13.5m)2*224.6m/8=50.19MJ
E=Ek+Ep=ρgH2L/8
Assuming it is deepwater in the bay,
L0=1.56T2
L0=1.56(12sec)2=224.6m
E=(1000kg/m3)*9.81m/s2*(1.58m)2*224.6m/8= 687.5KJ
If you assume it is shallow water in the bay, then the wavelength will
be different and you will get a different energy calculation:
Using the dispersion relationship and assuming the
depth is 3 meters:
L=(gT2/2π)*tanh(2πd/L)
I used the wave calculator found at the site,
http://www.coastal.udel.edu/faculty/rad/wavetheory.html, and found that
the wavelength is:
L=64.2m Then:
E=(1000kg/m3)*9.81m/s2*(1.58m)2*64.2m/8=
196.5KJ
The energy of the wave in the bay is even smaller if you assume it is
in shallow water with a depth of 3 meters. This proves that the
energy of the waves between the barrier island and the mainland is much
less than the energy of the waves that are hitting the barrier island
directly from the open ocean.
Next I need to analyze how the coastal wetlands
might affect the storm surge and wave height. It is my belief
that as long as the wetlands are not completely covered in water, the
friction they provide against the wave action will limit the energy
that the waves are carrying.
Depending on the depth of water over the wetlands, some percentage of
wave energy will be dissipated. From my knowledge I would think
that if water is completely covering the grasses, the friction it
creates with the water would not do much to the energy of the
wave. It would dissipate somewhere between 0% and 100% based on
how high the water is over the grasses. On the other hand, I
believe that if the grass is coming above the water then it will be
able to dissipate 100% of the wave energy and decrease the potential
for damage to the mainland. No good studies have been done to
completely justify my thinking, but there are reports that agree
somewhat with my assumptions.
Coastal Wetlands of Louisiana (LaCoast)
Storm surge from major hurricanes and tropical
storms causes great damage to America's coastline because of the
increased wave height that comes with it and the flooding that
occurs. The best defense for humans against this destructive
force is another of mother nature's creations; barrier islands and
coastal wetlands. I have proven herein that wave height and wave
energy are dissipated by the presence of barrier islands along the
United States coastline. In theory I also believe that coastal
wetlands play a big role in quelling storm surges and diminishing wave
energy. Despite all of this, we still cannot completely escape
the wrath of mother nature because the extreme force of storms such as
hurricanes cannot be completely stopped by anything. While my
analysis has many assumptions and is far from perfect in its theory, I
believe that I have done a successful job in proving how wave heights
increase with increased water depth. However one major caveat in
my analysis is that when storm surge occurs near to shore it is
partially due to the shallower water as you get near land. It is
hard to determine whether increased storm surge then increases wave
height or decreases wave height. It is too complicated a question
for me to get a clear answer to, because you would need to analyze the
surge and wave height of individual cases to get a feeling for what
happens in particular storms. I still feel I have proved that
wave height does increase with deeper water, and that is a good enough
conclusion for what I have been trying to understand.
Islands. Gulf
Islands National Seashore-Mississippi District. 1 June 2003. < http://www.nps.gov/archive/guis/extended/MIS/MNature/Islands.htm>.
University
of Delaware Wave Calculator. University
of Delaware. < http://www.coastal.udel.edu/faculty/rad/wavetheory.html>.
Wetlands Break Waves,
Quell Surge,
Coastal Landscape Battles Weather to Protect Mainland. LaCoast. < http://www.lacoast.gov/WaterMarks/2006-03/2protectMainland/>.